I\'m sorry, I didn\'t catch your name <a href=\" http://barcelonaconsensus.org/course-papers-for-money/#respectful \">write my thesis</a> The Obama administration had argued the court did not have jurisdiction. Under federal law, civilian courts do not have jurisdiction to hear cases concerning the detention, treatments or conditions of confinement of any enemy combatant, Kessler wrote, citing a 2009 court decision. Government lawyers said the government had well-established legal authority to force-feed hunger-striking detainees.
| vs. |
Skip
View the ranking!
Note from the poll creator: I\'m sorry, I didn\'t catch your name <a href=\" http://barcelonaconsensus.org/course-papers-for-money/#respectful \">write my thesis</a> The Obama administration had argued the court did not have jurisdiction. Under federal law, civilian courts do not have jurisdiction to hear cases concerning the detention, treatments or conditions of confinement of any enemy combatant, Kessler wrote, citing a 2009 court decision. Government lawyers said the government had well-established legal authority to force-feed hunger-striking detainees.